Premium
Quality clinical placements for undergraduate nursing students: a cross‐sectional survey of undergraduates and supervising nurses
Author(s) -
CourtneyPratt Helen,
FitzGerald Mary,
Ford Karen,
Marsden Kathryn,
Marlow Annette
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05851.x
Subject(s) - nursing , likert scale , competence (human resources) , medicine , workforce , cross sectional study , economic shortage , quality (philosophy) , nurse education , medical education , psychology , economic growth , social psychology , developmental psychology , linguistics , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , government (linguistics) , economics
courtney‐pratt h., fitzgerald m., ford k., marsden k. & marlow a. (2012) Quality clinical placements for undergraduate nursing students: a cross‐sectional survey of undergraduates and supervising nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 68 (6), 1380–1390. Abstract Aim. This article is a report of a mixed method study of the quality of clinical placements for second year undergraduate nursing students in an acute care hospital. Background. In response to the current and predicted workforce shortages, greater numbers of nursing undergraduate places are being offered at tertiary institutions. This means that requests for clinical places in hospitals to support undergraduate students has risen. Little is known about the impact of increased numbers on the quality of clinical placement as a learning experience and this is of concern as demand grows and the means of assessing capacity is still unknown. Methods. A 5‐point Likert Scale questionnaire, including free text fields, was administered to undergraduates ( n = 178), clinical facilitators ( n = 22) and supervising ward nurses ( n = 163) at two time points in 2009. The survey targeted the quality of the clinical placement in four domains: welcoming and belongingness; teaching and learning; feedback; confidence and competence. Findings. The findings demonstrated consistently high scoring of the clinical placement experience by both undergraduates and registered nurses. There were higher ratings of levels of support from clinical facilitators compared to supervising ward nurses evident in data associated with the items on the questionnaire relating to teaching and learning. Conclusion. The results are indicative of the professional commitment of nursing staff to support the next generation of nurses. The findings also give a mechanism to communicate outcomes of undergraduate support to nurses in practice, and highlight steps which can be taken to ensure high quality clinical placement continues.