Premium
Self‐assessment or self deception? A lack of association between nursing students’ self‐assessment and performance
Author(s) -
Baxter Pamela,
Norman Geoff
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05658.x
Subject(s) - competence (human resources) , self assessment , nursing , psychology , test (biology) , affect (linguistics) , medicine , nurse education , medical education , social psychology , paleontology , communication , biology
baxter p. & norman g. (2011) Self‐assessment or self deception? A lack of association between nursing students’ self‐assessment and performance. Journal of Advanced Nursing 67 (11), 2406–2413. Abstract Aim. The aim of this study was to examine senior year nursing students’ ability to self‐assess their performance when responding to simulated emergency situations. Background. Self‐assessment is viewed as a critical skill in nursing and other health professional programmes. However, while students may spend considerable time completing self‐assessments, there is little evidence that they actually acquire the skills to do so effectively. By contrast, a number of studies in medicine and elsewhere have cast doubt on the validity of self‐assessment. Method. In 2007, a one‐group pre‐test, post‐test design was used to answer the question, ‘How accurate are senior year nursing students in assessing their ability to respond to emergency situations in a simulated medical/surgical environment compared to observer assessment of their performance?’ A total of 27 fourth year nursing students from a university in Ontario were asked to complete a questionnaire before and after an objective structured clinical examination which assessed their ability to respond to emergency situations. Self‐assessments were compared with observed performance. Findings. The experience of dealing with the simulated crisis situations significantly increased perceived confidence and perceived competence in dealing with emergency situations, although it did not affect self‐perceived ability to communicate or collaborate. All but 1 of the 16 correlations between self‐assessment and the objective structured clinical examination total scores were negative. Their self‐assessment was also unrelated to several indices of experience in critical care settings. Conclusion. Self‐assessment in nursing education to evaluate clinical competence and confidence requires serious reconsideration as our well‐intentioned emphasis on this commonly used practice may be less than effective.