z-logo
Premium
Nursing and healthcare students’ experiences and use of e‐learning in higher education
Author(s) -
Moule Pam,
Ward Rod,
Lockyer Lesley
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05453.x
Subject(s) - psychology , medical education , relevance (law) , nurse education , health care , focus group , higher education , peer learning , active learning (machine learning) , student engagement , virtual learning environment , nursing , pedagogy , medicine , computer science , sociology , political science , anthropology , law , economics , economic growth , artificial intelligence
moule p., ward r. & lockyer l. (2010)  Nursing and healthcare students’ experiences and use of e‐learning in higher education. Journal of Advanced Nursing   66 (12), 2785–2795. Abstract Aim.  This paper presents research on nursing and healthcare students’ experiences and use of e‐learning. Background.  The inception of e‐learning in higher education is supported by a policy background and technological developments, yet little is known of student experience and use in the United Kingdom. Methods.  Conducted in 2007 and 2008, this study employed a mixed methods approach. An initial quantitative questionnaire was completed by 25 Higher Education Institutions and nine case study sites were visited. In the sites 41 students took part in focus groups and 35 staff were interviewed. Findings.  Twenty‐four Higher Education Institutions used a virtual learning environment and all respondents used e‐learning to enable access to course materials and web‐based learning resources. Three main themes were identified from student interviews, ‘Pedagogic use’; ‘Factors inhibiting use’ and ‘Facilitating factors to engagement’. Student’s main engagement with e‐learning was at an instructivist level and as a support to existing face‐to‐face modes of delivery. Student use of Web 2.0 was limited, although a number were using social software at home. Limited computer access, computing skills, technical issues and poor peer commitment affected use. Motivation and relevance to the course and practice, in addition to an appreciation of the potential for student‐centred and flexible learning, facilitated use. Conclusion.  There is scope to broaden the use of e‐learning that would engage students in the social construction of knowledge. In addition, experiences of e‐learning use could be improved if factors adversely affecting engagement were addressed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here