Premium
Nurses’ views on ethical codes: a focus group study
Author(s) -
Verpeet Ellen,
De Casterle Bernadette Dierckx,
Arend Arie Van der,
Gastmans Chris A.E.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03513.x
Subject(s) - ethical code , focus group , context (archaeology) , nursing , function (biology) , identity (music) , nursing research , psychology , code (set theory) , medicine , engineering ethics , computer science , sociology , paleontology , physics , set (abstract data type) , evolutionary biology , anthropology , acoustics , engineering , biology , programming language
Aim. This paper reports a study exploring nurses’ views on the ‘potential’ content and functions of an ethical code for nurses in Belgium. The term ‘potential’ is used, because Belgian nurses do not have experience with an ethical code. Background. Ethical codes have been developed to guide nurses’ practice and to improve their professional status. Little empirical research, however, has been undertaken to determine nurses’ views on the content and functions of these codes. The available quantitative studies merely give some information on nurses’ (lack of) knowledge and use of their ethical code. No nursing ethical code currently exists in Belgium. Qualitative research exploring nurses’ views, therefore, was needed in order to find out which functions an ethical code could fulfil and what the code's content could be. Method. Eight focus groups were conducted with 50 nurses in different healthcare settings in Belgium. Data were generated during 2003. Findings. According to participants, an ethical code could fulfil several functions, including supporting their professional nursing identity (external function) and giving guidelines for nursing practice (internal function). In addition, some aspects of content were mentioned, including nurses’ responsibilities in a relational context: particular attention should be paid to the personality of the nurse and to the specificity of nursing as a relational activity. Most agreement was reached on the ‘ethical’ function of the code, namely guiding nurses’ professional moral practice. Regarding disciplinary use and the need for legalization of the ethical code, on the contrary, opinions were divergent. Conclusions. It is of utmost importance to take into account nurses’ views when developing an ethical code for their profession. This study gave a first picture of the views of nurses themselves. These initial findings should be completed with nurses’ views on the formulation, dissemination and promotion of the ethical code. Such evidence‐based development of an ethical code will probably give more guarantees that the code will meet nurses’ expectations and will function optimally.