Premium
Countertransference and self‐injury: a cognitive behavioural cycle
Author(s) -
Rayner Gillian C.,
Allen Shelly L.,
Johnson Martin
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03344.x
Subject(s) - feeling , psychology , countertransference , cognition , punitive damages , affect (linguistics) , intervention (counseling) , psychotherapist , coping (psychology) , social psychology , psychiatry , communication , political science , law
Aim. This paper discusses the emotional, cognitive and behavioural effects of self‐injury on nurses as helpers, and shows the usefulness of a cycle that can affect care provision for this group of people. Background. People self‐injure for many different reasons, such as feeling angry, sad, guilty or frightened and these emotions are often linked to feeling helpless, powerless or out of control. Self‐injury has often been reported as a coping strategy to gain control. Psychoanalytic and cognitive behavioural concepts have been used to understand why people self‐injure and also inform intervention strategies. Unfortunately, negative emotional responses in professionals may interfere with the effectiveness of any therapeutic relationship. Discussion. Negative emotional responses from nurses can affect the way they think about and behave towards clients who self‐injure. During clinical supervision or education, nurses’ thoughts can be challenged to become less negative, so that their resulting behaviour can also become less punitive. Non‐punitive or more positive behaviour can in turn challenge some of the negative self‐beliefs of clients. Conclusions. Knowledge about countertransference when working with people who self‐injure may reduce nurses’ negative thoughts and behaviours, which may result in improved client care.