Premium
Episiotomy and perineal trauma during childbirth
Author(s) -
Röckner Gunny,
Wahlberg Vivian,
Ölund Anders
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb03412.x
Subject(s) - episiotomy , childbirth , perineum , medicine , obstetrics , pregnancy , surgery , genetics , biology
A study was conducted to assess the frequency of episiotomy and spontaneous tears in 807 primiparas during singleton births. The incidence of episiotomy was 50%, spontaneous tears 22% and intact perineum 28%. A significantly lower frequency of episiotomy ( P < 0.001) as well as epidural anaesthesia ( P < 0.001) was found among immigrant women. There were no indications registered for 58% of the episiotomies. The non‐episiotomy group experienced more clitoris/labia tears ( P < 0.01). On the other hand there was a tendency towards an increased risk for second and third degree tears, 4.2% in the episiotomy group compared to 1.7% in the non‐episiotomy group ( P = 0.06). Haemorrhage (> 600 ml) was more frequent in the episiotomy group than in the non‐episiotomy group ( P < 0.001). We conclude that there is little support for the claim that episiotomy prevents tears in normal deliveries, and that the rationale for the practice of episiotomy is in need of reappraisal.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom