Premium
Edible coating affects physico‐functional properties and shelf life of chicken eggs during refrigerated and room temperature storage
Author(s) -
Wardy Wisdom,
Torrico Damir D.,
No Hong Kyoon,
Prinyawiwatkul Witoon,
Saalia Firibu K.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
international journal of food science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.831
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1365-2621
pISSN - 0950-5423
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02447.x
Subject(s) - haugh unit , shelf life , yolk , coating , food science , chemistry , whey protein , food preservation , biology , body weight , feed conversion ratio , organic chemistry , endocrinology
Summary Effects of chitosan, whey protein concentrate (WPC), mineral oil (MO) and/or soybean oil (SO) coating on egg quality were compared at 25 and 4 °C, respectively, during 5 and 20 weeks of storage. Storage time and temperature, and type of coating significantly affected Haugh unit, yolk index, weight loss, albumen pH and emulsifying capacity. Shelf life was extended 4 weeks by MO and SO and 2 weeks by chitosan and WPC longer than that observed for noncoated eggs at 25 °C. MO‐ and SO‐coated eggs maintained AA grade for 20 weeks at 4 °C. Weight loss of SO‐coated eggs was <1% after 5 weeks at 25 °C and after 20 weeks at 4 °C. Yolk index and emulsifying capacity were more correlated at 25 °C than at 4 °C. MO and SO were more effective coating materials, with SO providing a more cost‐effective coating for extending egg shelf life.