Premium
Study of selected quality and agronomic characteristics and their interrelationship in Kabuli‐type chickpea genotypes ( Cicer arietinum L.)
Author(s) -
Khattak Amal Badshah,
Khattak Gul Sanat Shah,
Mahmood Zahid,
Bibi Nizakat,
Ihsanullah Ihsanullah
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
international journal of food science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.831
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1365-2621
pISSN - 0950-5423
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01193.x
Subject(s) - genotype , biology , horticulture , swelling , volume (thermodynamics) , forensic science , non invasive ventilation , zoology , agronomy , medicine , gene , biochemistry , physics , genetics , pathology , quantum mechanics
Summary Impact of genotype on quality, agronomic characteristics and their interrelationship in Kabuli‐type chickpea was investigated to provide significant feedback to breeder for selection/evolution of the most suitable varieties. Seven genotypes were studied for seventeen physical, chemical and agronomic characteristics. The effect of Kabuli‐type chickpea genotype on the physicochemical parameters, cooking time and agronomic characteristics were significant. Maximum seed size and volume were recorded for CC98/99 (0.32 g and 0.26 mL seed −1 , respectively), density and swelling index for the genotype FLIP97‐179C (having minimum seed size and volume), while the rest of the genotypes were statistically the same. Weight, volume after hydration, hydration capacity and swelling capacity followed the same pattern. Maximum moisture, protein and mineral concentration were noted in CC98/99. Seed protein concentration for the remaining genotypes was statistically non‐significant from one another. Longer period was taken by CM 2000 for flowering and maturity (130 and 181 days, respectively). Minimum time to flowering and maturity was taken by CC98/99. Genotype CC 98/99 outyielded all other genotypes (2107 kg ha −1 ). Seed size and seed volume were strongly and positively correlated with protein content, weight after hydration, volume after hydration, hydration and swelling capacities ( r = 0.83–1.0). Strong correlation was also noted among different agronomic characters.