Premium
Effect of Institutional Heating Methods of Cold and Hot Boned Restructured Beef Roasts
Author(s) -
NOBLE JANET M.,
McMAHON PAMELA S.,
SEMAN D. L.,
MOODY W. G.,
DOUGLASS LARRY W.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of food science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1750-3841
pISSN - 0022-1147
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb05200.x
Subject(s) - flavor , chemistry , food science , tenderness , aftertaste
Hot‐ and cold‐boned (HB and CB, respectively) restructured beef roasts were cooked in either: a conduction oven, convection steamer, low temperature cook/hold over or low temperature controlled humidity cook/hold oven. CB roast cooked in the conduction oven had higher cooking yields and lower shear values than CB roasts prepared by convection and low temperature controlled humidity cook/hold oven. HB roasts, cooked in the conduction oven, also had slightly higher cooking yields than other methods. No differences for shear values were apparent for HB roasts cooked in the various ovens. A sensory panel indicated CB and HB roasts had a browned beefy flavor, were juicy and moderately blended with little aftertaste. Restructured roasts are satisfactory for food service/institutional use but differences in yield and tenderness due to cooking method should be recognized.