Premium
STABILITY OF OIL‐IN‐WATER EMULSIONS. 2. Effects of Oil Phase Volume, Stability Test, Viscosity, Type of Oil and Protein Additive
Author(s) -
ACTON J. C.,
SAFFLE R. L.
Publication year - 1971
Publication title -
journal of food science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1750-3841
pISSN - 0022-1147
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1971.tb03360.x
Subject(s) - emulsion , gelatin , chemistry , soy protein , sodium , soybean oil , viscosity , chromatography , corn oil , volume (thermodynamics) , aqueous two phase system , sodium caseinate , phase (matter) , food science , materials science , biochemistry , organic chemistry , physics , quantum mechanics , composite material
SUMMARY –Stability of oil‐in‐water emulsions stabilized in sodium caseinate, gelatin and soy sodium proteinate was found to be increased by either an increase in the aqueous phase protein concentration (0.5–2.5%) or oil phase volume (20–50%). Both factors were significantly interrelated. Emulsions stabilized by soy sodium proteinate were generally higher in stability as compared to those stabilized by gelatin or sodium caseinate. With emulsions containing gelatin, greater stability occurred when the stability testing temperature was increased from 37–70°C and when the time interval was decreased from 24 hr to 90 min. Maximum relative viscosities of emulsions stabilized by gelatin and sodium caseinate were 2.0 and 2.5, respectively. Emulsions stabilized by soy sodium proteinate were quite viscous, with relative viscosity from 1.5–30 depending on both protein concentration and oil phase volume. Interchanging the emulsified oil among corn, soybean, safflower and peanut oils did not alter emulsion stability when examined at three concentrations of soy sodium proteinate. Changing the oil to olive oil significantly increased emulsion stability at each soy sodium proteinate level with oil phase volumes of 30, 40 and 50%.