Premium
Laser capture microdissection reveals dose–response of gene expression in situ consequent to asbestos exposure
Author(s) -
Yin Qi,
Brody Arnold R.,
Sullivan Deborah E.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
international journal of experimental pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.671
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1365-2613
pISSN - 0959-9673
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2007.00545.x
Subject(s) - laser capture microdissection , pathology , gene expression , in situ hybridization , lung , biology , microdissection , gene , medicine , biochemistry
Summary The genes that mediate fibroproliferative lung disease remain to be defined. Prior studies from our laboratory showed by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry that the genes coding for tumour necrosis factor alpha, transforming growth factor beta, the platelet‐derived growth factor A and B isoforms, and alpha‐1 pro‐collagen are expressed in fibroproliferative lesions that develop quickly after asbestos inhalation. These five genes, along with matrix metalloproteinase 9, a collagenase found to be increased in several lung diseases, are known to control matrix production and cell proliferation in humans and animals. Here we show by laser capture microdissection that (i) The six genes are expressed at significantly higher levels in the asbestos‐exposed mice when comparing the same anatomic regions ‘captured’ in unexposed mice. (ii) The bronchiolar‐alveolar duct (BAD) junctions, where the greatest number of fibres initially deposit, were always significantly higher than the other anatomic regions for each gene. The first alveolar duct bifurcation (ADB) generally was higher than the second ADB, the ADBs were always significantly higher than the airway walls and pleura, and the airway walls and pleura were generally higher than the unexposed tissues. (iii) Animals exposed for 3 days always exhibited significantly higher levels of gene expression at the BAD junctions and ADBs than animals exposed for 2 days. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a dose–response to a toxic particle in situ , and this response appears to be dependent on the number of fibres that deposits at the individual anatomic site.