z-logo
Premium
Comparison of the root‐end seal provided by bioceramic repair cements and White MTA
Author(s) -
Leal F.,
DeDeus G.,
Brandão C.,
Luna A. S.,
Fidel S. R.,
Souza E. M.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01871.x
Subject(s) - bioceramic , seal (emblem) , dentistry , white (mutation) , materials science , forensic engineering , engineering , medicine , orthodontics , composite material , archaeology , history , chemistry , biochemistry , gene
Leal F, De‐Deus G, Brandão C, Luna AS, Fidel SR, Souza EM. Comparison of the root‐end seal provided by bioceramic repair cements and White MTA. International Endodontic Journal , 44 , 662–668, 2011. Abstract Aim  To compare the ability of Ceramicrete, BioAggregate and white ProRoot MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate) to prevent glucose leakage through root‐end fillings. Methodology  After root canal instrumentation, the apical 3 mm of maxillary incisors were resected and retropreparations, 3 mm in depth, were created with ultrasound. Root‐end cavities were filled with the tested materials (15 roots per group). All roots were mounted in a double‐chamber system to assess glucose penetration using 15 psi pressure application. After 1 h, glucose concentrations in the lower chamber were measured following an enzymatic reaction. Four roots were used as controls. One‐way anova verified differences in glucose leakage between groups and Tukey test performed multiple comparisons. Significance was set at α = 5%. Results  There was a significant difference between the three materials ( anova , P  <   0.05). Ceramicrete had significantly lower glucose penetration than BioAggregate (Tukey, P  <   0.05). There was no difference between the two bioceramic cements and white MTA ( P  >   0.05). Conclusions  Both endodontic bioceramic repair cements displayed similar leakage results to white MTA when used as root‐end fillings materials. Ceramicrete had significantly lower glucose penetration.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here