Premium
Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta‐percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study
Author(s) -
Aydın B.,
Köse T.,
Çalışkan M. K.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01624.x
Subject(s) - root canal , gutta percha , dentistry , perforation , hero , molar , materials science , orthodontics , mathematics , medicine , art , composite material , punching , literature
Aim To compare the effectiveness of gutta‐percha removal and the maintenance of canal anatomy when using the HERO 642 system or Hedström files (H‐files) in mandibular molar teeth. Methodology The root canals of 40 mandibular molar teeth were instrumented using H‐files and filled with gutta‐percha and sealer. After 1 year in storage, the roots were sectioned horizontally to provide apical, middle and coronal root thirds. Sections were photographed, and an individual muffle was produced for each tooth. Teeth were randomly divided into four groups ( n = 10) and the gutta‐percha removed using either the HERO 642 system or H‐files, with or without solvent. Digital images of the root canals were then re‐taken. Root thirds were inspected for lateral perforations, and the percentage of the residual canal filling was determined on postoperative images. Transportation and centring ratio were calculated using preoperative and postoperative images of the cross‐sections of root thirds. Results H‐files groups were associated with less filling material than the HERO 642 system (H‐files–HERO 642 P = 0.056, H‐files–HERO 642+solvent P = 0.041, H‐files + solvent–HERO 642 P = 0.018, H‐files + solvent–HERO 642 + solvent P = 0.016). The percentage of residual filling material was similar in the apical thirds, and the contribution of solvent to canal debridement was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). Perforation occurred mesiobuccally in 48% of specimens in the apical sections of mesial roots. There were no significant differences for centring ratio, transportation and perforation rate between groups. Conclusions H‐files left less gutta‐percha overall; however, there was no difference in the apical third. The effect of solvent was not remarkable. Both instrument systems created a large number of perforations.