z-logo
Premium
Antioxidant and pro‐oxidant properties of chlorhexidine and its interaction with calcium hydroxide solutions
Author(s) -
Yeung S. Y.,
Huang C. S.,
Chan C. P.,
Lin C. P.,
Lin H. N.,
Lee P. H.,
Jia H. W.,
Huang S. K.,
Jeng J. H.,
Chang M. C.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01271.x
Subject(s) - chemistry , reactive oxygen species , antioxidant , chlorhexidine , radical , xanthine oxidase , xanthine , calcium hydroxide , superoxide , nuclear chemistry , hydroxyl radical , scavenger , oxidative stress , dna damage , genotoxicity , biochemistry , dna , organic chemistry , dentistry , enzyme , toxicity , medicine
Aim  To evaluate the antioxidant and pro‐oxidant properties of chlorhexidine (CHX). Methodology  The scavenging and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by CHX in the presence or absence of saturated Ca(OH) 2 solutions was evaluated. The reaction emitted chemiluminescence in the presence of lucigenin thus was determined by a luminometer to evaluate the levels of ROS production. Changes in DNA conformation were analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Paired Student's t ‐test was used to compare the difference between groups. Results  Chlorhexidine (0.00002–0.02%) effectively scavenged 56–88% of the superoxide radicals generated by the xanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction. Through analysis of PUC18 DNA conformation changes, CHX was shown to be a mild scavenger of hydroxyl radicals generated by H 2 O 2 plus FeCl 2 . However, CHX (>0.083%) decreased the mobility of PUC18 plasmid DNA with potential production of DNA–DNA cross‐link and severe DNA breaks (presence of DNA smear) at further higher concentrations. Furthermore, CHX induced ROS production including H 2 O 2 and superoxide radicals in 0.1N NaOH (pH = 12.76) or Ca(OH) 2 (pH = 12.5) solutions. Conclusion  Chlorhexidine exhibited both antioxidant and pro‐oxidant properties under different conditions. These events are possibly involved in the killing of root canal and periodontal microorganisms when CHX and Ca(OH) 2 were used in combination or separately. Potential genotoxicity and tissue damage when extruded into the periradicular tissue and at higher concentrations should be considered during periodontal and endodontic practice.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here