Premium
The effect of storage time on the degree of dye leakage of root‐end filling materials
Author(s) -
HIGA R.K.,
TORABINEJAD M.,
MCKENDRY D. J.,
MCMILLAN P. J.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00264.x
Subject(s) - dentistry , india ink , leakage (economics) , materials science , significant difference , wax , gutta percha , composite material , root canal , mathematics , medicine , anatomy , statistics , economics , macroeconomics
Summary The quality of the apical seal obtained by root‐end filling materials generally has been assessed by the extent of dye penetration. Most investigators have allowed the root‐end filling materials to set before they are tested. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if storage time had any influence on the amount of dye leakage. Seventy extracted single rooted human anterior teeth were used. After removal of their anatomical crowns, the roots were instrumented, filled with gutta‐percha and Roth's sealer, and subjected to test conditions. The roots were coated with two coats of nail polish. Root ends were resected and class I cavities prepared. Sixty class I root‐end cavities were filled with with either amalgam, super EBA, or IRM (20 each). Ten roots in each group were placed immediately into India ink for 48 h, the other 10 were stored for 24 h before placement into the ink. Ten roots (five per group) were used as positive (gutta‐percha, no sealer) and negative (bone wax) controls. The roots were then demineralized, linear dye leakage was measured, and the data were evaluated statistically using ANOVA. Super EBA, and IRM showed significantly less dye leakage than amalgam ( P <0.0001). No significant difference existed between Super EBA and IRM. Storage time had no significant influence on the amount of dye leakage observed in this study.