Premium
Type I cytokine profiles of human naïve and memory B lymphocytes: a potential for memory cells to impact polarization
Author(s) -
Gagro Alenka,
Servis Drazen,
Cepika AlmaMartina,
Toellner KaiMichael,
Grafton Gillian,
Taylor Dale R.,
Branica Srecko,
Gordon John
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.297
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1365-2567
pISSN - 0019-2805
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02342.x
Subject(s) - cd154 , cd40 , biology , breakpoint cluster region , cytokine , immunology , microbiology and biotechnology , receptor , cytotoxic t cell , genetics , in vitro
Summary B cells bifurcating along ‘type 1’ or ‘type 2’ pathways under the influence of polarizing cytokines can, in turn, influence the direction of an immune response. Here, we compare the capacity of human B cells residing within naïve and memory compartments to participate in type 1 polarizing responses. B‐cell receptor (BCR) engagement provided the main signal for interleukin (IL)‐12Rβ1 expression in the two subsets: this was potentiated by CD154 together with interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ) but inhibited by IL‐12. IL‐12Rβ2 could be induced on a minority of B cells by the same signals, and also by IFN‐γ alone. WSX‐1, a receptor for IL‐27, was expressed in both subsets with no evidence for its regulation by the signals studied. While neither subset was capable of secreting much IL‐12 p70, memory B cells could produce a small amount of IL‐12 p40 on CD40 ligation. Memory B cells also, exclusively, expressed IL‐23 p19 mRNA on BCR triggering. Importantly, products of appropriately stimulated memory – but not naive – B cells were shown to promote the synthesis of IFN‐γ in uncommitted T‐helper cells. The data indicate an equal capacity for naïve and memory B cells to respond within a type 1 polarizing environment. Although poorly equipped for initiating type 1 responses, B cells – by virtue of the memory subset – reveal a capacity for their maintenance and amplification following T‐dependent signalling.