The comparative roles of electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours

Electron microscopy has contributed to the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours for four decades, and immunohistochemistry for two. Because of its relative ease of use and interpretation, the latter technique has become extensively and routinely applied to identify lines of differentiation in benign soft tissue tumours and in sarcomas. The use of electron microscopy has declined but retains a role because few antibodies are wholly specific or fully sensitive, some tumours are polyphenotypic or divergent in differentiation, and others have no specific antigens. Immunohistochemistry is superior in diagnosis of smooth muscle tumours, small round cell tumours, sarcomas with epithelioid morphology, and most synovial sarcomas. Electron microscopy is of particular value for peripheral nerve sheath tumours, marker‐negative synovial sarcomas, pleomorphic sarcomas and mesotheliomas. As with all adjunctive techniques, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy should be used in a complementary fashion according to the nature of the diagnostic problem.