z-logo
Premium
The utilization of long‐chain fatty acids as markers for diet composition estimates in ruminants: effects of animal species, diet composition and marker combination
Author(s) -
Ferreira L. M. M.,
Celaya R.,
Santos A. S.,
Falco V.,
Guedes C.,
Rodrigues M. A. M.,
Osoro K.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00774.x
Subject(s) - composition (language) , herbaceous plant , ruminant , biology , feces , alkane , animal species , zoology , food science , rumen , botany , biochemistry , agronomy , ecology , pasture , philosophy , linguistics , catalysis , fermentation
Utilization of long‐chain fatty acids (LCFA) as diet composition markers, combined or not with alkanes, was evaluated in a study performed with sheep, goats and cattle fed on two different diets composed of herbaceous species and heather. Proportions of plant species were estimated from LCFA concentrations in plant species and faeces, using least‐square procedures, and were compared with those obtained using alkanes or LCFA + alkane. The impact of grouping plant species with similar LCFA + alkane profiles and the application of different levels of feeding selectivity within the dietary group on the accuracy of estimates were also assessed. Results showed that LCFA faecal recoveries were incomplete and tended to increase with carbon‐chain length in a curvilinear fashion in both diets and all animal species. Furthermore, differences between ruminant species and diets in the LCFA faecal recovery were observed. Combination of alkanes and LCFA provided the most accurate estimates of diet composition, while estimates based on LCFA alone were better than those using alkanes alone. Accuracy of these estimates differed among animal species but was not influenced by diet composition. Grouping plant species with similar LCFA + alkane profiles reduced the accuracy of estimates with a clear underestimation of the dietary group.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here