Premium
Dry matter production, nutritive value and efficiency of nutrient utilization of a complementary forage rotation compared to a grass pasture system
Author(s) -
Garcia S. C.,
Fulkerson W. J.,
Brookes S. U.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2008.00636.x
Subject(s) - pasture , agronomy , forage , dry matter , grazing , biology , lolium multiflorum
In pasture‐based dairy farming, new sustainable systems that involve the annual dry matter (DM) production of grazed and conserved forage beyond the potential of grazed pasture alone are being sought. The objective of this experiment conducted in Australia was to compare a complementary forage rotation (CFR) for conservation and grazing, comprising an annual sequence of three crops, namely maize ( Zea mays L), forage rape ( Brassica napus L) and a legume (Persian clover, Trifolium repesinatum L or maple pea , Pisum sativum L), with a pasture [kikuyu grass ( Pennisetum clandestinum ) over‐sown with short‐rotation ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum L)] as a pasture control treatment. The experiment was a complete randomized block design with four replicates (∼0·7 ha each). Annual dry‐matter (DM) yield over the 3 years averaged >42 t ha −1 year −1 for the CFR treatment and >17 t ha −1 year −1 for the pasture treatment. The high DM yield of the CFR treatment resulted from >27 t ha −1 year −1 from maize harvested for silage and >15 t DM ha −1 year −1 utilized by grazing the forage rape and legumes. Total input of nitrogen (N) and water were similar for both treatments, resulting in higher N‐ and water‐use efficiency for the CFR treatment, which was more than twice that for the pasture treatment. Overall, the nutritive value of the pasture treatment was slightly higher than the mean for that of the CFR treatment. The implications of these results are that a highly productive system based on the CFR treatment in conjunction with the use of pasture is achievable. Such a dairy production system in Australia could increase the total supply of feed resources grown on‐farm and the efficiency of use of key resources such as N and water.