Premium
Opportunities for reducing the environmental impact of dairy farming managements: a systems approach
Author(s) -
JARVIS S. C.,
WILKINS R. J.,
PAIN B. F.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1996.tb02034.x
Subject(s) - greenhouse gas , environmental science , fertilizer , silage , agriculture , production (economics) , slurry , dairy farming , agronomy , agricultural science , manure management , agricultural engineering , environmental engineering , engineering , economics , biology , ecology , macroeconomics
Dairy farming systems are important sources for the emission of a number of materials that include various forms of nitrogen (NO 3 − , N 2 O and NH 3 ) with potential environmental impact. The present paper is a systems synthesis study and assesses the likely impact of changes in management on N flows and losses. These include tactical fertilizer adjustment, slurry injection, maize silage production and the use of white clover as an alternative to fertilizer N. Implications for greenhouse gases (N 2 O and CH 4 ) and support energy have also been considered. Substantial reductions in inputs and total and proportional losses by all die options considered were predicted by this study. Thus, using a tactical approach to fertilizer application and injecting slurry or using 50% maize silage reduced overall N losses from 160 (under conventional management) to 86 and 109kg Nha −1 respectively. Combining both possibilities reduced losses further to 69 kg ha −1 . Although use of white clover, especially at low contents in the sward, was the most effective regime to reduce losses, this was at some cost to production so that losses per livestock unit (LU) did not always differ from those under other managements. Changing the N management had consequences for greenhouse gas emission with an estimated maximum 70% reduction in N 2 O release. The effects on CH 4 emissions were relatively small. Substantial reductions in support energy costs were also obtained: these arose mainly from the reduction in fertilizer N use, which represented 66% of the total support energy in the original system.