Premium
A comparison of formic acid and an acid‐salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation
Author(s) -
DAVIES O. D.,
HAIGH P. M.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01837.x
Subject(s) - silage , formic acid , lactic acid , chemistry , food science , zoology , fermentation , acetic acid , lactation , butyric acid , agronomy , biology , biochemistry , bacteria , pregnancy , genetics
Perennial ryegrass, harvested as second‐cut material on 10 and 11 July 1990, was treated with either formic acid at 31 t ‐1 or an acid‐salt type additive at 61 t ‐1 and ensiled in roofed 150 t bunker silos. Subsequently both silages underwent a predominantly lactic fermentation. Nevertheless the acid‐salt‐treated silage had a significantly higher quantity of formic acid (19 vs 12 g kg DM ‐1 ) and significantly lower levels of lactic (98 vs 118 g kg DM ‐1 ) and acetic acid (11 vs 17 g kg DM ‐1 ) compared with formic acid‐treated silage. In‐silo losses and effluent production were similar. Each silage was individually fed to 10 October‐calving Friesian dairy cows (average weight 565 kg) from weeks 2 to 15 of lactation, together with 3 kg d ‐1 of a compound feed containing 190 g kg DM ‐1 crude protein and with an estimated metabolizable energy content of 12·6 MJ kg DM ‐1 . The acid‐salt additive had no significant effect on silage DM intake, daily milk yield, milk protein or cow liveweight change, but significantly increased milk butterfat content compared with formic acid‐treated silage. It is concluded that the acid‐salt type additive produced little difference in terms of either silage fermentation or animal performance compared with formic add treatment.