Premium
The economic consequences of integrating whole‐crop wheat with grass production on dairy farms in the UK: a computer simulation
Author(s) -
DOYLE C. J.,
MASON V. C.,
BAKER R. D.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1990.tb02198.x
Subject(s) - silage , crop , forage , agronomy , production (economics) , milk production , environmental science , biology , agricultural engineering , zoology , economics , engineering , macroeconomics
Harvesting techniques, which involve simultaneously preserving and upgrading mature crops of whole cereals using an alkali, have been developed. When treated crops have been fed to sheep and cattle, satisfactory intakes and growth rates have been observed. With the possibility of falling cereal prices, such an end‐use for grain crops may be attractive in the future. Accordingly, a mathematical model of the production, harvesting and utilization of whole‐crop wheat and grass silage has been developed to examine the economic implications. Using the model, the comparative costs of growing and feeding alkali‐treated whole‐crop wheat in place of grass silage for winter milk production have been examined. A milk production system based on whole‐crop wheat rather than grass silage is estimated to improve profits by up to £130 per cow. However, the improvement in profitability is very sensitive to assumptions about the uses for surplus land or silage arising from such a switch. Furthermore, for physiological reasons it may be prudent to restrict the quantity of whole‐crop wheat fed to about 50% of the total forage intake. Thus, whole‐crop cereals may best be seen as a complement to rather than a substitute for grass silage. However, in the absence of data on feeding dairy cows with treated wheat silage, research is required before the computer simulations can be corroborated.