Premium
The effects of silage harvesting system and supplementation of silage‐based diets by protein and methionine hydroxy analogue on the performance of lactating cows
Author(s) -
GORDON F. J.,
UNSWORTH E. F.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1986.tb01785.x
Subject(s) - silage , milking , zoology , ice calving , methionine , forage , lactation , total mixed ration , chemistry , biology , food science , agronomy , biochemistry , amino acid , pregnancy , genetics
Three silages were produced by harvesting grass using either a flail (F), double‐chop (DC) or a precision‐chop (PC) forage harvester. Each silage was ensiled unwilted and with formic acid additive applied at the mean rate of 2·2 1 t ‐1 of grass. All three silages were well preserved and had mean particle lengths of 54, 49 and 26 mm and digestible organic ma er in dry ma er (DOMD) values of 0·67,0·66 and 0·66 for the F, DC and PC silages, respectively. The three silages were offered ad libitum to three groups each of 21 British Friesian cows, with a mean calving date of 29 January, from day 8 of lactation until 9 April. Within each silage group all cows were offered 4·1 kg dry ma er (DM) d ‐1 of a control supplement divided equally in two feeds and given during milking. In addition, 24 kg DM d ‐1 of the control supplement (C), a high protein supplement (HP) or a supplement containing methionine hydroxy analogue (MHA) were given at midday. The mean crude protein contents of the total supplementary feeds given were 193 253.and 195gkg for the C, HP and MHA treatments, respectively. The treatment effects showed no significant interactions between silage harvesting system and type of supplement. Silage harvesting system influenced milk yield, with the mean yields over the final 21 days of the experiment being 26·1, 27·4 and 25·5 kg d ‐1 for the F, DC and PC silages, respectively, and the difference between DC and PC achieved significance (P <0·05). However, the milk from cows given DC had a significantly lower concentration of fat (P <0·01) and silage harvesting system had no effect on the yield of fat or protein. The type of supplement had no significant effect on milk yield, with the mean yields over the final 21 days of the experiment being 264, 267 and 259 kg d ‐1 for the C, HP and MHA supplements, respectively.