z-logo
Premium
Silage and milk production: a comparison between grass silages of different chop lengths and digestibilities
Author(s) -
CASTLE M. E.,
GILL M. S.,
WATSON J. N.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1981.tb01536.x
Subject(s) - silage , chop , zoology , milk production , composition (language) , biology , chemistry , food science , mathematics , biochemistry , linguistics , philosophy , endoplasmic reticulum
Four grass silages of two chop lengths and two D‐values were made from S23 perennial ryegrass, and compared in a feeding experiment with lactating cows and in an eating‐behaviour study with non‐lactating cows. The median chop lengths were 11·6 and 11·5 mm in the short silages and 18·2 and 19·5 mm in the medium silages. Chop length had negligible effects on D‐value and on pH with values of 3·81 and 3·94 on the short and medium silages respectively. Silage DM intakes were higher on the short than on the medium‐chop silages in both experiments except where the high D‐value silage was supplemented with concentrates. Milk yields were not affected significantly by chop length with daily values of 19·3 and 19·7 kg per cow on the short and medium treatments respectively with the high D‐value silage, and 18·2 and 18·3 kg per cow with the low D‐value silage. Chop length had only small and non‐significant effects on milk composition. Eating times expressed as min per kg DM were significantly lower on the short than on the medium‐chop silages. It is concluded that the small differences between the short‐ and the medium‐chop silages were of no economic importance.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here