z-logo
Premium
A COMPARISON OF BROADCAST AND WIDE‐ROW SPACED GRASSES WHEN MANAGED FOR FOGGAGE PRODUCTION
Author(s) -
Gardner A. L.
Publication year - 1958
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1958.tb00130.x
Subject(s) - perennial plant , agronomy , sowing , dry matter , biology , yield (engineering) , physics , thermodynamics
A small‐plot trial comparing perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy and meadow fescue sown broadcast and also in 21 inch rows was conducted at Auchincruive from 1954 to 1957. The cutting treatments were arranged so that measurement could be made of both summer and winter production. Of the four species, cocksfoot was the most suitable for foggage production. Perennial ryegrass suffered severely from winter killing. Timothy and meadow fescue, although persistent, did not yield as much as cocksfoot. Total dry‐matter production over three years was higher from the cocksfoot rows than from the broadcast stand. For ryegrass and meadow fescue, broadcasting gave higher yields than row sowing while timothy showed no significant difference between sowing methods. During the winter, all species showed a loss of dry matter. Losses for ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy and meadow fescue were respectively 34%, 17%, 18% and 24%. Broadcast stands averaged 11% greater loss than the rows.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here