Premium
Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward
Author(s) -
Conant Richard T.,
Ryan Michael G.,
Ågren Göran I.,
Birge Hannah E.,
Davidson Eric A.,
Eliasson Peter E.,
Evans Sarah E.,
Frey Serita D.,
Giardina Christian P.,
Hopkins Francesca M.,
Hyvönen Riitta,
Kirschbaum Miko U. F.,
Lavallee Jocelyn M.,
Leifeld Jens,
Parton William J.,
Megan Steinweg Jessica,
Wallenstein Matthew D.,
Martin Wetterstedt J. Å.,
Bradford Mark A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x
Subject(s) - environmental science , decomposition , soil carbon , soil organic matter , organic matter , ecosystem , climate change , carbon cycle , carbon fibers , soil science , soil water , ecology , environmental chemistry , chemistry , materials science , biology , composite number , composite material
The response of soil organic matter ( OM ) decomposition to increasing temperature is a critical aspect of ecosystem responses to global change. The impacts of climate warming on decomposition dynamics have not been resolved due to apparently contradictory results from field and lab experiments, most of which has focused on labile carbon with short turnover times. But the majority of total soil carbon stocks are comprised of organic carbon with turnover times of decades to centuries. Understanding the response of these carbon pools to climate change is essential for forecasting longer‐term changes in soil carbon storage. Herein, we briefly synthesize information from recent studies that have been conducted using a wide variety of approaches. In our effort to understand research to‐date, we derive a new conceptual model that explicitly identifies the processes controlling soil OM availability for decomposition and allows a more explicit description of the factors regulating OM decomposition under different circumstances. It explicitly defines resistance of soil OM to decomposition as being due either to its chemical conformation ( quality ) or its physico‐chemical protection from decomposition. The former is embodied in the depolymerization process, the latter by adsorption/desorption and aggregate turnover. We hypothesize a strong role for variation in temperature sensitivity as a function of reaction rates for both. We conclude that important advances in understanding the temperature response of the processes that control substrate availability, depolymerization, microbial efficiency, and enzyme production will be needed to predict the fate of soil carbon stocks in a warmer world.