Premium
Disturbance, rainfall and contrasting species responses mediated aboveground biomass response to 11 years of CO 2 enrichment in a Florida scrub‐oak ecosystem
Author(s) -
SEILER TROY J.,
RASSE DANIEL P.,
LI JIAHONG,
DIJKSTRA PAUL,
ANDERSON HANS P.,
JOHNSON DAVID P.,
POWELL THOMAS L.,
HUNGATE BRUCE A.,
HINKLE C. ROSS,
DRAKE BERT G.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01740.x
Subject(s) - biomass (ecology) , canopy , environmental science , ecosystem , agronomy , nutrient , shoot , biology , ecology
This study reports the aboveground biomass response of a fire‐regenerated Florida scrub‐oak ecosystem exposed to elevated CO 2 (1996–2007), from emergence after fire through canopy closure. Eleven years exposure to elevated CO 2 caused a 67% increase in aboveground shoot biomass. Growth stimulation was sustained throughout the experiment; although there was significant variability between years. The absolute stimulation of aboveground biomass generally declined over time, reflecting increasing environmental limitations to long‐term growth response. Extensive defoliation caused by hurricanes in September 2004 was followed by a strong increase in shoot density in 2005 that may have resulted from reopening the canopy and relocating nitrogen from leaves to the nutrient‐poor soil. Biomass response to elevated CO 2 was driven primarily by stimulation of growth of the dominant species, Quercus myrtifolia , while Quercus geminata , the other co‐dominant oak, displayed no significant CO 2 response. Aboveground growth also displayed interannual variation, which was correlated with total annual rainfall. The rainfall × CO 2 interaction was partially masked at the community level by species‐specific responses: elevated CO 2 had an ameliorating effect on Q. myrtifolia growth under water stress. The results of this long‐term study not only show that atmospheric CO 2 concentration had a consistent stimulating effect on aboveground biomass production, but also showed that available water is the primary driver of interannual variation in shoot growth and that the long‐term response to elevated CO 2 may have been caused by other factors such as nutrient limitation and disturbance.