Premium
Opposite changes of whole‐soil vs. pools C : N ratios: a case of Simpson's paradox with implications on nitrogen cycling
Author(s) -
PIÑEIRO GERVASIO,
OESTERHELD MARTÍN,
BATISTA WILLIAM B.,
PARUELO JOSÉ M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01139.x
Subject(s) - cycling , mineralization (soil science) , soil carbon , ecosystem , nitrogen , environmental science , nitrogen cycle , soil organic matter , soil science , carbon cycle , organic matter , ecology , environmental chemistry , chemistry , soil water , biology , forestry , geography , organic chemistry
Ecosystem and soil scientists frequently use whole soil carbon:nitrogen (C : N) ratios to estimate the rate of N mineralization from decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM). However, SOM is actually composed of several pools and ignoring this heterogeneity leads to incorrect estimations since the smaller pools, which are usually the most active, can be masked by the larger pools. In this paper, we add new evidence against the use of C : N ratios of the whole soil: we show that a disturbance can decrease the whole‐soil C : N ratio and yet increase C : N ratios of all SOM pools. This curious numerical response, known as Simpson's paradox, casts doubt on the meaning of frequently reported whole‐soil C : N changes following a disturbance, and challenges the N mineralization estimates derived from whole‐soil C : N ratio or single‐pool modeling approaches. Whole‐soil C : N ratio may not only hide features of the labile SOM pool, but also obscure changes of the large recalcitrant SOM pools which determine long‐term N availability.