Premium
Growth response of subalpine fir ( Abies lasiocarpa ) to climate in the Olympic Mountains, Washington, USA
Author(s) -
ETTL GREGORY J.,
PETERSON DAVID L.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00023.x
Subject(s) - abies lasiocarpa , montane ecology , precipitation , environmental science , growing season , elevation (ballistics) , climate change , range (aeronautics) , subalpine forest , physical geography , ecology , geography , biology , meteorology , materials science , geometry , mathematics , composite material
Growth response of subalpine fir ( Abies lasiocarpa ) to climate was studied across its local geographical and elevation range in the Olympic Mountains, Washington. A dendroecological analysis of subalpine fir across a range of elevations (1350‐1850 m) and annual precipitation (125‐350 cm y −1 ), was used to compare environmental factors affecting growth. Climate‐growth relationships were explored using Pearson product‐moment correlation coefficients; partial correlation analysis was used to assess relationships among site chronologies and climatic variables. Radial growth is negatively correlated with winter precipitation at high elevation and wet sites, but not at low and middle elevation dry sites. Growth is positively correlated with current growing season temperature at all sites; however, growth is negatively correlated with previous year August temperature, indicating that climate affects growth in subsequent years. Positive correlations between growth and summer precipitation during the growing season at low and middle elevation dry sites suggest that soil moisture is partially limiting to growth on these sites. If the climate of the Pacific Northwest becomes warmer and drier, then subalpine fir growth may increase at high elevation and wet sites, but may decrease at lower elevation dry sites in the Olympic Mountains. However, the growth response of subalpine fir to potentially rapid climate change will not be uniform because subalpine fir grows over a wide range of topographic features, habitats, and local climates at different geographical scales. A comparison of growth response to current growing season temperature suggests that the temperature‐related growth response of subalpine fir is not adequately described by the parabolic curve used in JABOWA‐based models.