Premium
Monitoring and volumetric estimation of injected CO 2 using 4D seismic, petrophysical data, core measurements and well logging: a case study at Ketzin, Germany
Author(s) -
Ivanova Alexandra,
Kashubin Artem,
Juhojuntti Niklas,
Kummerow Juliane,
Henninges Jan,
Juhlin Christopher,
Lüth Stefan,
Ivandic Monika
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01045.x
Subject(s) - petrophysics , geology , saturation (graph theory) , seismology , radius , well logging , amplitude , core (optical fiber) , economic geology , seismic survey , aquifer , soil science , mineralogy , geophysics , geotechnical engineering , metamorphic petrology , groundwater , materials science , combinatorics , computer science , composite material , tectonics , quantum mechanics , physics , porosity , computer security , mathematics
More than 50 000 tons of CO 2 have been injected at Ketzin into the Stuttgart Formation, a saline aquifer, at approximately 620 m depth, as of summer 2011. We present here results from the 1 st repeat 3D seismic survey that was performed at the site in autumn 2009, after about 22 000 tons of CO 2 had been injected. We show here that rather complex time‐lapse signatures of this CO 2 can be clearly observed within a radius of about 300 m from the injection well. The highly irregular amplitude response within this radius is attributed to the heterogeneity of the injection reservoir. Time delays to a reflection below the injection level are also observed. Petrophysical measurements on core samples and geophysical logging of CO 2 saturation levels allow an estimate of the total amount of CO 2 visible in the seismic data to be made. These estimates are somewhat lower than the actual amount of CO 2 injected at the time of the survey and they are dependent upon the choice of a number of parameters. In spite of some uncertainty, the close agreement between the amount injected and the amount observed is encouraging for quantitative monitoring of a CO 2 storage site using seismic methods.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom