z-logo
Premium
Characterization of fractured reservoirs using a consistent stiffness‐permeability model: focus on the effects of fracture aperture
Author(s) -
Shahraini Ali,
Ali Aamir,
Jakobsen Morten
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00934.x
Subject(s) - geology , azimuth , reservoir modeling , permeability (electromagnetism) , seismic inversion , inverse problem , fracture (geology) , economic geology , hydrogeology , geotechnical engineering , geometry , mathematics , mathematical analysis , membrane , biology , telmatology , genetics
In this paper we propose a method for the characterization of naturally fractured reservoirs by quantitative integration of seismic and production data. The method is based on a consistent theoretical frame work to model both effective hydraulic and elastic properties of fractured porous media and a (non‐linear) Bayesian method of inversion that provides information about uncertainties as well as mean (or maximum likelihood) values. We model a fractured reservoir as a porous medium containing a single set of vertical fractures characterized by an unknown fracture density, azimuthal orientation and aperture. We then look at the problem of fracture parameter estimation as a non‐linear inverse problem and try to estimate the unknown fracture parameters by joint inversion of seismic amplitude versus angle and azimuth data and dynamic production data. Once the fracture parameters have been estimated the corresponding effective stiffness and permeability tensors can be estimated using consistent models. A synthetic example is provided to clearly explain and test the workflow. It shows that seismic and production data complement each other, in the sense that the seismic data resolve a non‐uniqueness in the fracture orientation and the production data help to recover the true fracture aperture and permeability, because production data are more sensitive to the fracture aperture than the seismic data.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here