Premium
Reconstruction of the layer anisotropic elastic parameters and high‐resolution fracture characterization from P‐wave data: a case study using seismic inversion and Bayesian rock physics parameter estimation
Author(s) -
Bachrach Ran,
Sengupta Mita,
Salama Antoun,
Miller Paul
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00768.x
Subject(s) - anisotropy , azimuth , geology , seismic anisotropy , seismic inversion , amplitude , geophysics , physics , optics
Wide‐azimuth seismic data can be used to derive anisotropic parameters on the subsurface by observing variation in subsurface seismic response along different azimuths. Layer‐based high‐resolution estimates of components of the subsurface anisotropic elastic tensor can be reconstructed by using wide‐azimuth P‐wave data by combining the kinematic information derived from anisotropic velocity analysis with dynamic information obtained from amplitude versus angle and azimuth analysis of wide‐azimuth seismic data. Interval P‐impedance, S‐impedance and anisotropic parameters associated with anisotropic fracture media are being reconstructed using linearized analysis assuming horizontal transverse anisotropy symmetry. In this paper it is shown how additional assumptions, such as the rock model, can be used to reduce the degrees of freedom in the estimation problem and recover all five anisotropic parameters. Because the use of a rock model is needed, the derived elastic parameters are consistent with the rock model and are used to infer fractured rock properties using stochastic rock physics inversion. The inversion is based on stochastic rock physics modelling and maximum a posteriori estimate of both porosity and crack density parameters associated with the observed elastic parameters derived from both velocity and amplitude versus angle and azimuth analysis. While the focus of this study is on the use of P‐wave reflection data, we also show how additional information such as shear wave splitting and/or anisotropic well log data can reduce the assumptions needed to derive elastic parameter and rock properties.