z-logo
Premium
Shallow fault location in coal measures using offset Wenner resistivity profiling 1
Author(s) -
Hobbs B.A.,
Reading A.M.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00214.x
Subject(s) - geology , gemology , electrical resistivity and conductivity , offset (computer science) , igneous petrology , economic geology , computation , coal , environmental geology , petrology , depth sounding , mineralogy , hydrogeology , seismology , engineering geology , geotechnical engineering , telmatology , volcanism , algorithm , tectonics , computer science , electrical engineering , waste management , oceanography , engineering , programming language
The five‐electrode resistivity configuration of Barker, who introduced the concept of offset resistivity measurements, is used in a profiling mode in the search for lateral variations of resistivity down to depths of a few tens of metres. Theoretical computations show that plotting simple pseudosections of offset measurements over faults is sufficient to reveal the fault position. The method is subsequently applied in the field for locating a buried fault in coal measures. Although offset pseudosections are often all that is required, apparent resistivity pseudosections are examined and compared to collations of 1D inversions of the sounding profile data and to computations over 2D models. It is shown that apparent restivity pseudosections may present a rather misleading picture.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here