Premium
ON REVERSE‐TIME MIGRATION *
Author(s) -
GAZDAG J.,
CARRIZO E.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1986.tb00495.x
Subject(s) - seismic migration , extrapolation , environmental geology , computation , regional geology , robustness (evolution) , interpolation (computer graphics) , computer science , offset (computer science) , geology , economic geology , algorithm , geometry , mathematical analysis , computer vision , image (mathematics) , mathematics , geophysics , seismology , biochemistry , chemistry , metamorphic petrology , gene , telmatology , programming language , tectonics
Migration is a process whereby events in ‘image space’ are mapped into their correct positions in ‘object space’. The wave equations associated with this mapping may be defined and solved numerically either in image space or in object space. In the former the CMP section, which represents the initial conditions, is extrapolated toward increasing depths, and the migrated data are recovered at zero time. In the latter, the wave‐field extrapolation takes place in the coordinate frame of the depth section, and the CMP data serve as boundary conditions at the surface. Computations begin at the last sample of the record section and continue ‘reverse time’ until time zero. This paper describes a reverse‐time migration (RTM) method and compares its performance with that of an image‐space method based on the idea of phase shift plus interpolation (PSPI). Synthetic zero‐offset sections serve as examples for migration experiments with the RTM and PSPI methods. It is shown that the RTM approach to migration is rather expensive, but its robustness and accuracy are difficult to surpass.