Premium
INTERPRETATION AND DEPTH OF INVESTIGATION OF GRADIENT MEASUREMENTS IN DIRECT CURRENT GEOELECTRICS *
Author(s) -
SCHULZ R.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb01362.x
Subject(s) - electrical resistivity and conductivity , overburden , homogeneous , geometry , mineralogy , geology , gemology , boundary (topology) , physics , mathematical analysis , mathematics , geotechnical engineering , thermodynamics , engineering geology , paleontology , tectonics , quantum mechanics , volcanism
A bstract Gradient measurements in a homogeneous electrical primary field can easily be interpreted for simple models. The simplified solution (conducting or resistant body in a homogeneous space in a homogeneous electrical field) is often sufficiently accurate, as comparisons with the exact solution (body of finite resistivity in a homogeneous half‐space in a quasihomogeneous electrical field) show. The exact geometry of the body cannot be determined by gradient measurements; the same anomaly of apparent resistivity can be caused by different bodies. In particular, the similarity between a sphere and a cube of the same volume is very high. There is a distinct influence of the resistivity of the overburden: the higher this resistivity is, the stronger is the effect caused by a buried body. If a deviation of 10% of the apparent resistivity is assumed as the lower boundary at which a buried body can be detected by gradient measurements, the depth of investigation for a three‐dimensional body is approximately equal to its width; in the two‐dimensional case the thickness of the overburden can be twice the width. If the overburden has a resistivity which is higher than the resistivity of the substratum, these depths are greater. The greatest possible depth is approximately three times the width of the body.