Premium
SEISMIC SOURCES FOR SHALLOW REFLECTION SURVEYING *
Author(s) -
McCANN D. M.,
ANDREW E. M.,
McCANN C.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb00790.x
Subject(s) - borehole , geology , vertical seismic profile , seismology , reflection (computer programming) , seismic refraction , igneous petrology , geotechnical engineering , tectonics , engineering geology , volcanism , computer science , programming language
A bstract A standard seismic reflection profile was shot along a disused railway track at Onley, near Rugby, U. K. Four different seismic sources including explosives, the propane/oxygen gas‐gun, the Bolt airgun, and the borehole sparker were used and compared with each other in terms of output energy, penetration and resolution. The results indicated that the resolution of the borehole airgun and the gas‐gun was slightly higher than that possible with gelignite. Both these sources had an output energy which was equivalent to 30 g of gelignite. The borehole sparker was only useful for obtaining seismic information on the nearsurface weathered layer, since its output power (1 kJ) was very limited. However, McCann and McCann (1982) used a high‐power sparker source (14 kJ) on the nearby Grand Union Canal for a wide angle seismic reflection survey and achieved a maximum penetration of 250 m, which is comparable with the results obtained on land with the seismic sources mentioned above. The seismic reflection profile, which was interpreted in the light of borehole information in the area and the results of McCann and McCann (1982), successfully identified the surface of the Palaeozoic rocks. The problem of detecting the presence of thin, high‐velocity layers in a seismic refraction survey without the availability of other information to calibrate the seismic section is also highlighted.