Premium
FINITE‐DIFFERENCE EVALUATION OF APPARENT RESISTIVITY CURVES *
Author(s) -
MUFTI I.R.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1980.tb01218.x
Subject(s) - discretization , isotropy , finite difference method , electrical resistivity and conductivity , finite difference , computation , resistive touchscreen , borehole , matrix (chemical analysis) , point source , mechanics , geometry , electrical conductor , geology , mathematical analysis , mathematics , materials science , physics , geotechnical engineering , optics , algorithm , computer science , quantum mechanics , composite material , computer vision
A bstract The problem of numerical evaluation of apparent resistivity curves is treated by finite difference modeling. The models proposed are set up in cylindrical coordinates and yield the potential field due to a point source located in a radially symmetric environment. The Schlumberger configuration, widely used for surface measurements, is emphasized. However, the treatment is equally applicable to other similar situations such as the computation of synthetic electric logs when the resistivity of the borehole fluid is different from that of the surrounding uniform or stratified medium. Moreover, the individual layers may not necessarily be isotropic. The medium under investigation is discretized by using a very coarse system of horizontal and vertical grid lines whose distance from the source increases logarithmically; consequently, the physical dimensions of the medium can be made “infinite” without affecting the numerical size of the model. Finer features such as a thin but anomalously resistive or conductive bed which would ordinarily be missed in coarse discretization are accurately taken into account, since the calculations are done in terms of the Dar Zarrouk parameters derived from the exact resistivity distribution of the model. This enables one to compute the potential field by inverting a small sparse matrix. When the medium comprises only a few layers, the efficiency of the finite‐difference model is comparable to that of the known analytical methods; for more complicated structures, however, the finite‐difference model becomes more efficient. The accuracy of finite‐difference results is demonstrated by comparing them with the corresponding analytically obtained data.