Premium
Behavioural compensation reduces energy expenditure during migration hyperphagia in a large bird
Author(s) -
Guillemette Magella,
Richman Samantha E.,
Portugal Steven J.,
Butler Patrick J.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
functional ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.272
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2435
pISSN - 0269-8463
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01993.x
Subject(s) - foraging , energy expenditure , energy budget , biology , bird migration , heart rate , ecology , time budget , forage , doubly labeled water , energy (signal processing) , work (physics) , zoology , statistics , endocrinology , mechanical engineering , mathematics , blood pressure , engineering
Summary 1. Bird migration is often seen as the summit of animal performance. Because higher foraging effort associated with fuelling and increased flight activity should generate maximum level of energy turnover, we expect the migratory process to be constrained by energy, whether it is energy expenditure or energy intake. 2. We used implanted data loggers to continuously monitor foraging effort, flight activity and heart rate (as a proxy for rate of energy expenditure), in a wild migratory sea duck before and after moult migration to test the energy budget limitation hypothesis. 3. We show that despite the fact that departing birds forage at three times the level observed during post‐migration, daily energy expenditure (DEE) remains the same when periods before and after migration are compared. 4. In an attempt to determine how the birds achieve such a feat, we compared heart rate when active (feeding and flying) for the periods before and after migration and found no significant difference for feeding and flight heart rate. However, heart rate during periods of inactivity was significantly lower during fuelling which together with a reduced time spent flying completely counteracted the observed high energy costs of foraging. 5. The time spent active represented a tiny proportion (8–20%) of the 24‐h time budget suggesting that energy minimization and an optimization process may be at work here, confounding any apparent support for the energy budget limitation hypothesis. We thus concluded that similar DEE before and after migration could be owing to the bird’s inability to increase energy expenditure over a certain limit or to the survival costs associated with a certain level of physical exertion. Nevertheless, our results indicate that behavioural, and possibly physiological, compensation may be used as a mechanism to reduce the overall energy cost of fuelling in migrating birds.