Premium
Shifts in leaf N : P ratio during resorption reflect soil P in temperate rainforest
Author(s) -
Richardson Sarah J.,
Allen Robert B.,
Doherty James E.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
functional ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.272
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2435
pISSN - 0269-8463
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01426.x
Subject(s) - plant litter , biology , litter , temperate climate , rainforest , tropics , nutrient , soil water , tropical rainforest , agronomy , zoology , botany , ecology
Summary1 Large‐scale syntheses of leaf and litter N and P concentrations have demonstrated that leaf and litter N : P ratios both decline with latitude, that litter N : P ratios are generally greater than those of fresh leaves, and that the difference between these two ratios increases towards the tropics. These patterns have been ascribed to either a direct effect of temperature on plant growth rates and leaf‐level physiology, or a decline in soil P towards the tropics. We test the hypothesis that global patterns of leaf and litter N : P ratios reflect a soil‐P gradient by examining leaf and litter N : P in all species from a temperate rainforest along a soil‐P gradient. 2 The soil P gradient followed a toposequence of 20 plots. There was > 50‐fold variation in soil total P from ridges (23–136 mg kg −1 ), through faces and terraces (32–744 mg kg −1 ), to gullies (440–1214 mg kg −1 ). 3 The N : P ratios of leaves and litter both declined as soil total P increased, and the N : P ratio of litter was greater than that of fresh leaves. The difference between litter N : P and fresh leaf N : P declined with increasing soil total P supporting the hypothesis that global patterns of N : P ratios reflect gradients of soil P. 4 Compositional turnover with soil P partly contributed to the total plant community leaf and litter nutrient concentration responses. However, consistent within‐species responses pointed to a soil‐based mechanism for determining responses by the total plant community. 5 Comparisons of our litter data to global data sets suggest that the vegetation was well adapted to low soil nutrient concentrations with 37% of litter N and 24% of litter P samples being below published thresholds for highly proficient nutrient resorption. 6 The range of leaf N and leaf P concentrations at our site captured a large portion of the range reported in global leaf trait data sets. 7 Highly proficient P resorption was responsible for the divergence in leaf and litter N : P ratios on P‐poor soils. These results emphasize the significance of proficient nutrient resorption as an advantageous plant trait for nutrient conservation on P‐poor soils.