Premium
Population genetic structure of three freshwater mussel (Unionidae) species within a small stream system: significant variation at local spatial scales
Author(s) -
BERG DAVID J.,
CHRISTIAN ALAN D.,
GUTTMAN SHELDON I.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01756.x
Subject(s) - unionidae , biology , population , biological dispersal , ecology , genetic structure , genetic variation , isolation by distance , threatened species , etheostoma , population genetics , genetic variability , mussel , freshwater bivalve , zoology , bivalvia , mollusca , genotype , fishery , habitat , biochemistry , demography , sociology , gene , fish <actinopterygii>
Summary 1. Unionid mussels are highly threatened, but little is known about genetic structure in populations of these organisms. We used allozyme electrophoresis to examine partitioning of genetic variation in three locally abundant and widely distributed species of mussels from a catchment in Ohio. 2. Within‐population variation was similar to that previously reported for freshwater mussels, but genotype frequencies exhibited heterozygote deficiencies in many instances. All three species exhibited significant among‐population variation. Evidence of isolation‐by‐distance was found in Elliptio dilatata and Ptychobranchus fasciolaris , while Lampsilis siliquoidea showed no geographical pattern of among‐population variation. 3. Our results suggest that the isolating effects of genetic drift were greater in L. siliquoidea than in the other species. Differentiation of populations occurred at a much smaller spatial scale than has previously been found in freshwater mussels. Differences among species may reflect differences in the dispersal abilities of fishes that serve as hosts for the glochidia larvae of mussels. 4. Based on our results, we hypothesise that species of mussels that are common to large rivers exhibit relatively large amounts of within‐population genetic variation and little differentiation over large geographical distances. Conversely, species typical of small streams show lower within‐population genetic variation and populations will be more isolated. If this hypothesis can be supported, it may prove useful in the design of conservation strategies that maintain the genetic structure of target species.