Range size in North American Enallagma damselflies correlates with wing size

Summary 1. Cross‐species macroecological comparisons in freshwater invertebrates have been restricted by a lack of large‐scale distributional data, and robust phylogenies. Here, we use data from the OdonataCentral database to explore body length–range size and wing length–range size relationships in damselflies from the genus Enallagma ; the recent publication of a phylogeny for this group meant that, as well as a cross‐species analysis, we were able to assess relationships in a phylogenetically controlled manner. 2. For cross‐species comparisons, only wing length showed significant (positive) regression relationships with range size and occupancy, although the inclusion of body length in multiple regressions increased the fit of the models. Damselflies with larger wings relative to their body length had larger distributions, a result confirmed by a significant positive relationship between range size and residuals from the regression of wing size on body size. 3. For the phylogenetically controlled analyses, only wing length contrast scores were significantly related to distribution patterns and entered into regression models; the significant positive relationships between wing length contrasts and both range size and occupancy contrasts suggested that evolutionary increases in wing length had occurred alongside range expansions. 4. Together these results suggest that species of Enallagma with larger wings (both absolute and relative to body length) tend to be more widely distributed in North America and that the evolution of wing size may have played a role in range expansion. No such relationships were evident for body size. We discuss the potential importance of wing morphometrics for studying the evolutionary ecology of freshwater insects.