Premium
The influence of periphyton, detritus and shelter on invertebrate colonization of aquatic bryophytes
Author(s) -
SUREN ALASTAIR M.,
WINTERBOURN MICHAEL J.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00543.x
Subject(s) - periphyton , invertebrate , detritus , biomass (ecology) , ecology , biology , abundance (ecology) , colonization , detritivore , hydrobiology , aquatic environment
SUMMARY 1. Artificial bryophytes were placed in a shaded and an unshaded New Zealand alpine stream to investigate why invertebrates colonized these structures and, by inference, real plants. Three experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of (i) periphyton and detritus (ii) shelter, and (iii) time, on invertebrate colonization. 2. In the first experiment, seven taxa at the unshaded site displayed a preference for substrata with high detrital and periphyton biomass, presumably reflecting a food relationship. At the shaded, less stable site, only two taxa displayed such a relationship. 3. Reducing substratum ‘stem’ density (i.e. ‘shelter’) in the second experiment had little effect on the biomass of periphyton at each site, and only at the shaded site was detrital biomass reduced on low‐density substrata. Abundances of most of the twenty‐two invertebrate taxa analysed were unaffected by stem density reduction: densities of only four taxa at the unshaded site, and two at the shaded site were reduced. 4. Stepwise multiple regression showed that invertebrate abundance was little affected by stem density at either site. Indeed, shelter was the primary factor influencing abundance of only two of twenty‐two taxa at the unshaded site, and none at the shaded site. Abundances of most taxa were related to periphyton or detrital biomass at each site. 5. The third experiment investigated temporal relationships between invertebrate density, periphyton and detrital biomass, and exposure time of artificial bryophytes. Regression analyses indicated that of twenty‐two taxa at the stable, unshaded site, eight were influenced by periphyton biomass, three by detrital biomass, and two by exposure time. At the unstable shaded site, abundances of only eight of twenty‐two taxa were significantly related to the measured variables, of which exposure time was most important (four taxa).