Premium
The distribution of macroinvertebrate communities in two Portuguese rivers
Author(s) -
GRAÇA M. A. S.,
FONSECA D. M.,
CASTRO S. T.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1989.tb01103.x
Subject(s) - alkalinity , invertebrate , ecology , hydrobiology , substrate (aquarium) , hydrology (agriculture) , streams , hydropsychidae , taxon , community structure , environmental science , diversity index , seasonality , river ecosystem , geography , biology , geology , chemistry , ecosystem , species richness , aquatic environment , computer network , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry , larva , computer science
SUMMARY. 1. The distribution of macroinvertebrates in two chemically different rivers of Central Portugal (Soure and Alva) was analysed. 2. In the Soure, a lowland, alkaline river (mean values for alkalinity, conductivity and pH, 101 mg I −1 CaCO 3 , 255 μS cm −1 and 7.8, respectively), a relatively high number of individuals and low diversity (mean H ’= 2.27) was found. There was considerable temporal variation in the number of individuals present. 3. In the Alva, a highland, acidic river (mean values for alkalinity, conductivity and pH. 4.8 mg 1 −1 CaCO 3 , 22 μ S cm −1 and 5.7, respectively), diversity was higher (mean H '=3.41). There were large temporal changes in the number of species present, but not in the number of individuals. 4. Similarity indices and cluster analysis identified six site‐types and seventeen groups of co‐occurring taxa. Some of the taxonomic groups were characteristic of one or more sites, hut others had no strong association with a particular site. Although the rivers differed considerably in terms of physico‐chemistry, communities in the upper sections of the two rivers were more similar to each other, than to other communities in the same river. The way the samples of both rivers were clustered seems to indicate that community structure was influenced by factors associated with (1) within river longitudinal variation (e.g. substrate grain size), (2) water chemistry, and (3) seasonal variations (e.g. temperature, flow).