Premium
The behavioural basis of prey selection by underyearling bream (Abramis brama (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.))
Author(s) -
WINFIELD IAN J.,
PEIRSON GRAEME,
CRYER MARTIN,
TOWNSEND COLIN R.
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1983.tb00666.x
Subject(s) - rutilus , biology , cladocera , copepod , predation , foraging , plankton , zooplankton , ecology , cyprinidae , zoology , fishery , fish <actinopterygii> , crustacean
SUMMARY. A clear difference in the ability lo escape from fish predators exists between members of the Cladocera and Copepoda. The results of our laboratory studies have shown that underyearling roach and bream both found copepods more difficult to capture than cladocerans. However, bream were far more efficient than roach at catching the more elusive copepod prey. The basis for this difference was the greater strike ability of bream, most likely related to its more protrusible mouth. In their natural environment the two species of fish exhibited food resource partitioning with planktonic Cladocera predominating in roach guts and copepods and non‐planktonic Cladocera composing the vast majority of the gut contents of bream. Differences in diet are partly due to their contrasting attack abilities. Additional variation may arise because of subtle differences in the timing and location of foraging.