Premium
Effectiveness of an artificial substrate for sampling macroinvertebrates in small streams
Author(s) -
ROBY K. B.,
NEWBOLD J. D.,
ERMAN D. C.
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1978.tb01420.x
Subject(s) - streams , invertebrate , ecology , sampling (signal processing) , environmental science , predation , range (aeronautics) , biology , coefficient of variation , substrate (aquarium) , statistics , mathematics , filter (signal processing) , computer network , materials science , computer science , composite material , computer vision
SUMMARY. Factors affecting invertebrate colonization of samplers consisting of twenty‐five 5‐cm diameter porcelain balls were studied in small northern California streams. Peaks in diversity, in number of individuals and in taxa, occurred after 2—4 weeks in each of four 10‐week colonization runs. Most variation in number of organisms was correlated with increases in organic detritus. Time was the second most important variable. The average coefficient of variation in total numbers collected from the artificial sampler was 0.40, slightly less than the average 0.56 for the Surber sampler. Published coefficients of variation for artificial substrates range from 0.109 to 0.849, which are similar to values reported from work with the Surber sampler. We had several practical difficulties with the artificial substrates. Samplers were lost, became clogged or buried, supported vertebrate predators and were costly. The samplers also collected some organisms in greater proportion than their occurrences in the natural substrate. In sampling small streams these disadvantages (compared to a Surber sampler) outweigh the slight reduction in sampling variability.