Premium
Feeding selectivity of a tropical Chaoborus population
Author(s) -
LEWIS WILLIAM M.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1977.tb01679.x
Subject(s) - bosmina , predation , instar , predator , cladocera , copepod , biology , population , zooplankton , ecology , functional response , larva , zoology , crustacean , demography , sociology
SUMMARY. The Chaoborus population of Lake Lanao, Philippines, was sampled weekly over a 65‐week period. Specimens representing all four instars, all times of the year, and two points in the daily migration cycle were dissected for determination of gut contents. Major items in the diet of Lanao Chaoborus include Bosmina, Diaphanosoma , and the copepodid and adult stages of cyclopoid and calanoid copepods. Items that are available but seldom eaten include nauplii and rotifiers except Keratella . Feeding rate averages 2.5% of body weight per day in instars 3–4. Predator size affects but does not fully explain prey selection. Electivity values are much higher for Bosmina and Diaphanosoma than for copepods, even though these food items overlap in size. Bosmina , which has the highest electivity value of any prey, is virtually identical in size to the calanoid nauplius, which has one of the lowest electivity values. This and other similar data suggest that prey of the same size differ greatly in palatability or vulnerability. There is a marked variation in feeding rate and food composition from day to night. The smallest Chaoborus feed more during the day than at night, but the opposite is true for Chaoborus of moderate to large size. Large Chaoborus switch from a daytime emphasis on copepod copepodids and adults to a nighttime emphasis on Cladocera. Diurnal variation between instars in food composition cannot be explained simply on the basis of the vertical distributions of predators and prey. An interaction of vertical distribution with prey density and predator selectivity does explain the overall Chaoborus feeding pattern, however. During the day, larger Chaoborus move deep into the water column where food is scarce. Their daytime feeding rate is lower due to low prey density at great depths. Low prey density is partially compensated by relaxation of preference. At night, upward migration of large Chaoborus into an area of high prey density permits a resumption of marked selectivity and high feeding rates. Small Chaoborus do not descend deep into the water column during the day, as their lower hunting efficiency apparently requires higher food density and use of visual cues to sustain adequate feeding rates. Prey density thus affects both the vertical distribution and feeding selectivity of the Chaoborus population.