Premium
A study of spring‐and autumn‐spawned herring (Clupea harengus L.) larvae in the Norwegian Coastal Current during spring 1990
Author(s) -
FOSSUM P.,
MOKSNESS E.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
fisheries oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.016
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1365-2419
pISSN - 1054-6006
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2419.1993.tb00122.x
Subject(s) - herring , clupea , otolith , fishery , hatching , spring (device) , larva , biology , predation , copepod , oceanography , norwegian , ichthyoplankton , abundance (ecology) , ecology , crustacean , fish <actinopterygii> , geology , mechanical engineering , linguistics , philosophy , engineering
An intensive sampling program for yolk‐sac herring larvae and microzooplankton was carried out in the main spawning area of Norwegian spring‐spawning herring during March to April 1990 (between 62 o and 63 o 30'N) to estimate their hatching period and the abundance of copepod eggs and nauplii. Additional investigations were carried out in the Skagerrak area during January‐March and on the Norwegian Shelf in May to study the otolith microstructure of the herring larvae. In May both autumn‐ and spring‐spawned herring larvae were found in the samples from the Norwegian Shelf. They were easily distinguished by differences in otolith microstructure. The pattern in increment widths in the otoliths of the autumn‐spawned larvae indicated that these larvae had not been transported through the Skagerrak area, but more likely were carried directly from the northern North Sea across the Norwegian Trench and into the Norwegian Coastal Current system. The calculated hatching of the spring‐spawned larvae sampled in May occurred significantly later than the observed hatching over the spawning grounds. The results suggest a mismatch between the abundance of first‐feeding herring larvae and their prey organisms, resulting in a higher survival of those herring larvae hatching during the latest part of the spawning period. This coincides with a general increase towards the middle of April in the abundance of prey organisms, from 1 to 4 1 _1 . There were no differences in otolith microstructure among spring‐spawned herring larvae sampled on the shelf in May, indicating that these larvae originated from the same cohort and were well mixed throughout the whole shelf area.