Premium
Strong pH influence on N 2 O and CH 4 fluxes from forested organic soils
Author(s) -
Weslien P.,
Kasimir Klemedtsson Å.,
Börjesson G.,
Klemedtsson L.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
european journal of soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.244
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2389
pISSN - 1351-0754
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01123.x
Subject(s) - soil water , greenhouse gas , environmental science , soil carbon , nitrous oxide , total organic carbon , carbon dioxide , environmental chemistry , sink (geography) , chemistry , flux (metallurgy) , afforestation , carbon sink , zoology , soil science , ecology , climate change , agroforestry , geography , biology , cartography , organic chemistry
Summary Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farmed organic soils can have a major impact on national emission budgets. This investigation was conducted to evaluate whether afforestation of such soils could mitigate this problem. Over the period 1994–1997, emissions of methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) were recorded from an organic soil site in Sweden, forested with silver birch ( Betula pendula Roth), using static field chambers. The site was used for grazing prior to forestation. Soil pH and soil carbon content varied greatly across the site. The soil pH ranged from 3.6 to 5.9 and soil carbon from 34 to 42%. The mean annual N 2 O emission was 19.4 (± 6.7) kg N 2 O‐N ha −1 and was strongly correlated with soil pH ( r = −0.93, P < 0.01) and soil carbon content ( r = 0.97, P < 0.001). The N 2 O emissions showed large spatial and temporal variability with greatest emissions during the summer periods. The site was a sink for CH 4 (i.e. −0.8 (± 0.5) kg CH 4 ha −1 year −1 ) and the flux correlated well with the C/N ratio ( r = 0.93, P < 0.01), N 2 O emission ( r = 0.92, P < 0.01), soil pH ( r = −0.95, P < 0.01) and soil carbon ( r = 0.97, P < 0.001). CH 4 flux followed a seasonal pattern, with uptake dominating during the summer, and emission during winter. This study indicates that, because of the large N 2 O emissions, afforestation may not mitigate the GHG emissions from fertile peat soils with acidic pH, although it can reduce the net GHG because of greater CO 2 assimilation by the trees compared with agricultural crops.