Premium
Immunohistochemical assessment of CD25 is equally sensitive and diagnostic in mastocytosis compared to flow cytometry
Author(s) -
Baumgartner C.,
Sonneck K.,
Krauth M.T.,
Kneidinger M.,
Födinger M.,
Hauswirth A. W.,
Müllauer L.,
Valent P.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
european journal of clinical investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.164
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1365-2362
pISSN - 0014-2972
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.01942.x
Subject(s) - flow cytometry , immunohistochemistry , il 2 receptor , pathology , staining , bone marrow , cytometry , medicine , systemic mastocytosis , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , immunology , t cell , immune system
Background Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clonal myeloid disorder characterized by abnormal accumulation and growth of mast cells (MC) in internal organs. In most cases, the bone marrow is involved. Expression of CD25 in bone marrow MC, with or without coexpression of CD2, is an important minor SM criterion. So far, most studies have examined CD25‐expression on MC by flow cytometry. Materials and methods We examined the expression of CD25 in MC in patients with SM ( n = 25) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and compared these data with results obtained by flow cytometric assessment of CD25‐expression. In addition, we compared CD25‐staining results with that obtained with an antibody against CD2. Results In a majority of all patients (> 80%), CD25 was detectable by both staining techniques. However, in one patient, CD25 was only detectable on MC by IHC, but not by flow cytometry, and in two patients in whom IHC could not be applied because of lack of compact MC infiltrates, flow cytometry revealed aberrant expression of CD25. The antibody against CD2 produced diagnostic staining results in a smaller group of patients (flow cytometry: 65%; IHC: 28% of SM cases) compared to CD25 (> 80%). Conclusions CD25‐IHC is equally diagnostic and sensitive in SM compared to flow cytometry and thus can be recommended as a diagnostic test. Our data also suggest that the diagnostic value of CD25 exceeds that of CD2, and that optimal assessment of CD25‐expression in neoplastic MC in all patients requires the application of both techniques, flow cytometry and IHC.