Premium
Forearm vasoconstrictor response in uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus
Author(s) -
Van Gurp P. J.,
Willemsen J. J.,
Lenders J. W. M.,
Ross H. A.,
Sweep C. G. J.,
Smits P.,
Tack C. J.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
european journal of clinical investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.164
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1365-2362
pISSN - 0014-2972
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01707.x
Subject(s) - medicine , vascular resistance , forearm , hemodynamics , sympathetic nervous system , microneurography , vasoconstriction , blood pressure , heart rate , diabetes mellitus , cardiology , perfusion , endocrinology , baroreflex , surgery
Background According to the ‘haemodynamic hypothesis’, increased tissue perfusion predisposes to microangiopathy in diabetic patients. We hypothesized that the typical haemodynamic changes underlying the increased tissue perfusion can be explained by a decreased sympathetic nerve activity caused by chronic hyperglycaemia. In this study we investigated sympathetic activity in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and methods In 15 DM patients (DM duration 6·3 ± 3·8 year; HbA1c 7·9 ± 1·3%) and 16 age‐ and sex‐matched healthy volunteers (Control), sympathetic nervous system activity was measured at rest (baseline) and during sympathoneural stimulation (lower body negative pressure (LBNP)) by means of interstitial and plasma noradrenaline (NA) sampling and power spectral analysis. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was measured before (baseline) and during a cold pressure test. Forearm blood flow was measured during forearm vascular α‐ and β‐adrenergic receptor blockade. Results At baseline, forearm vascular resistance (FVR), plasma NA concentrations, MSNA and heart rate variability were similar in both groups. LBNP‐induced vasoconstriction was significantly attenuated in the DM group compared with the Control group (ΔFVR: 12 ± 4 vs. 19 ± 3 arbitrary units, P < 0·05). The responses of plasma NA and heart rate variability did not differ. Conclusions Baseline FVR and sympathetic nerve activity are normal in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes. However, the forearm vasoconstrictor response to sympathetic stimulation is attenuated, which cannot be attributed to an impaired sympathetic responsiveness.